By Takura Zhangazha*
This is a global report whose executive summary can be found
on their website here.
I would however advise colleagues or followers of my blog to read it as extensively as they can. Not only be cause of its importance as to how the old and new media industries are interacting.
But also more importantly
as to how the new is shaping global journalism, reception of information,
social media use and how as is now a sociological given, affecting not only
human behavior at a global level. This
would include how we interact with global politics, economics and everyday existence
as human beings. Be it at a pragmatic
(food, sustenance, money) or even an emotional (religious, political and
historical) level.
I am not going to summarise the report in the form of a review.
I will take note of some of its key findings as they
differentiate global consumption of media products, new technologies and their
use between the global north and the global south.
While the report does not directly touch on Zimbabwe
specifically I am quite certain that it reflects general trends in the Southern
African region where it looks at South Africa, the country as an example.
What it makes generally clear to all of us is that we are no
longer both globally and regionally relying on traditional or mainstream media
for everyday news. Though in some European
countries mainstream media remains more important for more serious news. Be it
via television, radio and in some cited instances, traditional print
media.
In the global south like almost everywhere else in the world
there is a rise in the use of social media platforms to create new sources of
information via what we now refer to as ‘influencers’. These are individuals that as outlined in
the report are now either influencing news cycles through increasingly utilized
platforms such as Facebook, YouTube and TikTok or just generally shaping public
discourse as they deem for more likes and/or revenue.
Specifically in Zimbabwe we have witnessed the impact that
social media influencers are gaining.
Not only in politics but also entertainment (comedy skits) and religious
matters. Even with our mainstream media,
we are no longer as sure of who their primary sources of information are because
many news stories are broken first on social media platforms such as Whatsapp
before they are seen or confirmed in your regular newspaper, radio or
television station.
We have also within the Zimbabwean context seen how government
is trying to straddle these new platforms in order to control their societal impact.
This, by trying to have its own team of influencers in the form of ‘Varakashi’
countering narratives they deem to be detrimental to their hold on power.
Ditto the recent incident of war veteran Blessed Geza going
viral on social media and the subsequent at least three month detention of
journalist Blessed Mhlanga for interviewing him. A matter that is still pending
before the courts but caused international condemnation at the government's
repressive tendencies against the media.
What is however clear from the report within an African
context is that while we are not that much studied in it, we are clearly
enroute to the same societal impact in how we interact with mainstream social and
AI media.
Where in part this is now a generational question. It is younger men that are more interested in
new media and what I would hazard to call populist views on social media. One that tends to be more misogynist,
nationalist and materialistic. Especially
in the global north. Even though we now have our own mimicry versions here in
Zimbabwe that mix masochism, religion, displays of wealth, political partisanship’s
as measurements of life success. All mainly online.
And where it concerns young African women things become more
complex because of either gender based cyberbullying and the dominance of young
men online. Or an emerging celebrity female influencer culture that remains highly
sexualized and again misogynist. Almost
in the same tradition of mainstream British media ‘Page 3’ photoshoots of hyper-sexualised
young women.
The report however in a penultimate comment on it, makes
reference to Africa’s skepticism of AI.
On this, I would agree that for now here in the global south we are not
too trusting of news brought us via that ‘artificial’ way. The only catch is that we will be taught to
eventually do so.
Mainly because of AI’s inevitability in how we receive and
interact with news or critical technologies.
The only sad part is that we will not realize until its too late that AI is couched in what I consider borderline racist tropes about African people, their languages and their histories. Mainly because of the origins of its key inventors and how they process information, algorithms in their own imperial and preferential image(s). Please don’t talk about a gorilla fighting a hundred men in Africa!
Finally, and based on the report I have been citing, I should have probably done a video ‘podcast’ of my views on it. Even within the African context. Unfortunately I am not that photogenic. But we are now going to a situation in which where what we see and
simultaneously hear is increasingly more important in the media. Or our access to information. Over and above what we have the patience to read.
And that will be a big problem soon. If not already. Unless we become more contextually organic to our African diverse and progressive media cultures.
*Takura Zhangazha writes here in his personal capacity (takura-zhangazha.blogspot.com)
No comments:
Post a Comment