Tuesday 4 October 2011

Don’t Rush to ‘Unbundle’ the National Railways of Zimbabwe.

Don’t Rush to ‘Unbundle’ the National Railways of Zimbabwe.
By Takura Zhangazha.

There is a lot of media and political attention over state parastatals and their performance of late. It is fair to say that this sort of attention being given to state enterprises is important and necessary in order for them to be reformed or at least scrutinized for their failures or their successes. The most media and politically prone state enterprise has been our beleaguered national airline, Air Zimbabwe with various sections of our society calling for its privatization. Close on the heels of the national airline is the National Railways of Zimbabwe with calls for its privatization (read ‘unbundling’) reaching a new crescendo in the light of a strike by its workers in the last two weeks.
There are distinct problems with what can be considered as a ‘knee-jerk’ response by way of calling for the ‘unbundling’ of the NRZ as a panacea to its functional problems. While we are all entitled to various opinions on the advantages or disadvantages of privatization, our country’s disastrous experience with the ‘privatization’ phenomenon under the Economic Structural Adjustment Programmes(ESAP)must be instructive in how we find a solution to the shortcomings of the NRZ.

I have specifically chosen to discuss the NRZ because it is a very important parastatal of national strategic interest. Its network links our major cities and it is a key mode of transport for citizens as well as commodities. This is regardless of how it remains critically underutilized at the present moment.  It is unfortunate that it may become an easy target for privatization because no one really talks earnestly about it and its importance to our economy and our public transport system.
On first glance it is evident that things are not well with the NRZ and they have not been so for a very long time. The reasons cited as to why such a state of affairs exist have varied from poor management, the economic crisis that has straddled Zimbabwe for the last 15 or so years and where one asks World Bank economists, an intrusive government. And it is the former that tends to be blamed primarily on the premise that it does not have the capacity or innovation to run the railway company in tandem with the needs of the ‘market’.

Such an argument is classic neo-liberal economics, an economics which  is now increasingly discredited across the world due to the global financial crisis. This is however not to absolve the government of any blame at the state of affairs at the NRZ. And before we all rush to the technical details of the failure by government to run the parastatal, it is important to initially examine the national transport and communications policy of the government either via the Ministry of Transport and Communications or even the Ministry of Parastatals and State Enterprises. 
I know there has been debate around such a policy but to this day it is unknown (if it exists) to members of the public and probably Parliament. So before we take up the easy argument of selling one of our country’s most strategic assets, we must ask central government for an explanation and our approval of the national transport policy together with how the potential commercialization or privatization of the NRZ fits into it.
Even where the government explains its national transport policy, there are other options besides privatization of one component or other of the NRZ. There is the option of  commercialization of the entity which will be predicated on a national understanding of why we need to make the parastatal work in the national interest. 

This national interest would relate to its ability to expand its public transportation services to include the sadly abandoned urban transportation network and the still underutilized Masvingo-Gweru railway line. This would also entail internal reform of the NRZ to ensure accountable management as well as efficiency of the state company. It is agreed that this would need a lot of investment and resources that the government has argued it does not have. But this is a matter of priorities and it should be a paramount priority for the NRZ to work again, initially with direct state funding, and eventually on the basis of its ability generate and manage its revenues in the provision of a critical national service. 
It is evidently a difficult endeavour to find solutions to the myriad of problems that our national economy and our parastatals are facing, particularly for our inclusive government. This however should not be seen as easy permission for us or government ministers to find solutions in templates that have a history of making things worse. To seek to privatise the NRZ at this juncture is either to be incorrectly over confident in the World Bank’s understanding of ‘liberal economies’ and ‘economic reform’  or it is to be lacking in conscientious commitment to working to find sustainable and people centered solutions to our economic challenges. 

2 comments:

  1. Hi Takura, thanks for your special focus on the NRZ and triggering this important debate. I however have few issues which I thing needs to be part of this discussion. The first one yes you acknowledged that you chose to be specific on NRZ but we need to have a holistic approach when addressing the transporting system framework that is to say, rail, air and road given the fact that we are landlocked.
    The policy position needs to strike a strategic fit amongst these modes of transport infrastructure not forgetting the communications infrastructure, that is to say your telecommunications and signal allocations.
    The first point in that the tripartite transport mode of air, rail and road is virtually collapsed, thats why you see that the ZUPCO and urban rural road modes are mish mash. One cannot plan on what time he can depart from point A to another accurately. All you need to do is go by the road side and pray that “something” will come by.
    The airline on the other side of the equation is busy transporting one person from point A to B, forget about the small adverts they are busy flighting in the newspapers trying to attract customer. The issues of the management structure being top heavy etc and failing to service the common fund of connection routes among other will take another debate all together.
    Given the contest of attention of these transport mode the is need for a mix approach of both the government and the private sector teaming up to put our transport system back on its footing. In the NRZ, it has invested a lot of capital in infrastructure which is now obsolete and very difficult to transfer to other industries. Its stuck in the middle hence the need to upgrade and replace the helpless infrastructure. The locomotives for both goods and people are heavily and high energy consuming, the network very expensive to service and low cost engagement with the regional countries for connection fees etc.
    The cost of the failure of NRZ is transferred to our roads with the goods that are supposed to be on rail being on the roads hence the carnage and damaging on the road network.
    I hope that is our next level we are going to come up with policy positions that are building on synergies and develop a comprehensive policy framework for road, rail and air. If we are going to focus on isolating the three we risk taking a knee-jerk approach.
    Thanks for triggering this important debate

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks Rebels Word, i agree that we must be holistic. And you raise key points that talk to the issue of our national transport policy, which I am not sure if it exists. True, the 'gonyets'have come to replace the railway for the reasons you cite. A point that I am increasingly inclined to query is the new collusion between business and government to seek to simply parcel out everything, yet we know that our local business people have no money to sustain enterprises that have been 'outsourced' to them..

    ReplyDelete