By Takura Zhangazha*
The recent announcement
by the minster of finance, Patrick Chinamasa, on the compulsory pilot placement
of pre-paid water meters is a declaration of intent by government to privatise
water and water supply in urban Zimbabwe. It appears rational, even somewhat sensitive, especially when the minster in his made it clear that this rolling out of
prepaid water meters will start with industries and what he also referred to as
low density areas. The latter are assumed to be the harbingers of the well to
do in Zimbabwean society. The given assumption being that those who live
in these areas will never share political values with the majority poor who
live in what can also be referred to as the ‘high density areas’. Or that they will never mount a protest against these new undemocratic measures.
The intention is to
pretend to be sensitive to both assumed low and high density areas urban class interests. That is, to
demonstrate some affinity to the moneyed few who would have no problems with
paying directly for water so long it is supplied while telling the urban poor
that they will be initially treated differently. Or that they will not see
prepaid water meters arriving at their doorsteps within the short term period
or at least until the initial ‘pilot’ installations are complete.
This is all despite
the fact that there have been a number of protests against pre-paid water
meters by residents associations. The latter are spread across our cities
of Harare, Mutare, Bulawayo, Gweru, Masvingo and the town of Chitungwiza. Though disparate and sometimes in part over
reliant on donor funding to function, these associations have been the most
legitimate aggregation of popular dissent at the intentions of government to privatise
water.
The demonstrations should
have been a key sign to central and local government authorities to halt any
plans they had already announced over privatizing water. I have also previously written on this blog about the six steps that begin with the pre-paid meter system and eventually end up with the wholesale privatisation of water. Globally there have also been media reports of the problems that come with water privatisation and the overall verdict from those countries that have tried it to those that are considering it, is don't.
The authorities
undemocratic insistence is predicated on an argument that rests on the challenge
of low revenue collection from ratepayers as opposed to safe access. (Just listen to the radio programmes and adverts sponsored by the Harare City Council for proof of this). Not that citizens of
Zimbabwe do not want to pay nominal fees and rates for council services.
They do and they have been doing so ever since we inherited urban settlements
from the colonial state. And the rates they pay are not only for water
supplies but also other services. The major challenge is that a majority
of them do not have the readily available or disposable income to pay. That is
essentially the heart of the matter.
Implementing the
privatization of water will however not
resolve this serious challenge of paying water bills by residents and
ratepayers. It will essentially mean that already meager resources will no
doubt be utilized to purchase bare minimum water supply, a development that
is not only dangerous to our collective health but also patently
dehumanizing. The end effect will be that water as an historically communal
resource will become an individualized one. To the extent that it may
sadly become possible for one resident to refuse another a glass of drinking
water in order to save their prepaid supplies.
There are however those
that will support pre-paid water meters largely out of convenience or with the
intention of profiting from the tenders that will accompany their installation.
These colleagues do not do their cause any favours through expecting the
implementation of the privatization of water to be protected by the heavy hand
of the state in suppressing debate and protests in order to ram the policy down
the throats of citizens.
Even where they seek to
argue that prepaid water meters are about billing, then they should have predicate their arguments less on revenue collected and demonstrate how it essentially benefits access for all regardless of income. Besides, it is not necessarily a pre-paid meter that can accurately measure the amount of water used per
household. There are other unexplored and smarter ways of doing so. It is dangerous both politically and in humanitarian terms to subject
people to the mantra and tragic reality of , ‘no money, no water’.
There is therefore need
for community based organizations to renew their efforts at mobilizing
residents for further debate and peaceful protests against the privatization of
water. Furthermore this is a debate that should take on a national
dimension which must question the broad neo-liberal direction that our national
economic planning is taking under the current government. In doing so, we
should be guided by the fact that our country, Zimbabwe, is not for sale.
*Takura Zhangazha writes here in his personal capacity (takura-zhangazha.blogspot.com)
No comments:
Post a Comment