By Takura Zhangazha*
There is an increasing ambiguity when influential
Zimbabweans debate their current government’s macro-economic policies. This is probably because they do not have structured
differences with its neoliberal/free market/ease of doing business thrust.
Ordinary Zimbabweans are not so ambiguous in their own debates
and discussions. From general observations
they remain highly skeptical due to issues such as allegations of corruption. Or their own political biases as they relate
to internal Zanu Pf or mainstream opposition factions/formations.
There is however nuanced comments on issues to do with
infrastructure development. Particularly
where it concerns roads, bridges and state owned buildings/monuments. Something that points to Mnangagwa’s keen eye
on some sort of eventual ‘performance legitimacy’ putting paid to his
vociferous detractors. Especially as
they emerge intermittently on social media.
Mnangagwa’s economic blueprint for the next five years (2021-2025) is referred to as the National Development Strategy number one (NDS1) which was launched on 16 November 2020. With the assumption that there will likely be NDS2 as we head toward what they refer to as a ‘middle income income economy’ by 2030.
And the caveat that he wins the next elections scheduled
for 2023. And also that all national annual budgets including the recently
presented 2021 one should be read within the overall ambit of NDS1. (For an overview of the key issues in the 2021 Zimbabwe projected national budget you can visit NewZWire website
here.)
But it still remains important to analyze the priorities of
Mnangagwa’s anticipated and desired performance legitimacy over the next five years.
Priority number one is clearly pandering to the whims and
intentions of private capital. And this
is outlined in the NDS1 document which states,
“The 2021 -2025 Macroeconomic Framework is premised on the
adoption and swift implementation of bold strategies, policies and programmes
aimed at achieving economic transformation. This will be done through the
creation of a thriving private sector led competitive economy, implementation
of sound macroeconomic policies anchored on fiscal discipline, monetary and
financial sector stability including enhancing an open business friendly
environment, which promotes both foreign and domestic investment.” (Item 93)
You could easily refer to it as has been done in the global
north as a ‘socialism for the rich’ Wherein the intention is to make it as easy
as possible for global (east or west) private capital to do business in
Zimbabwe. Particularly in mining, agriculture, energy and
telecommunications/digital companies.
In tandem with this first priority would be a second one which is referred to in Section 94, the re-engagement of the international community (again read as global private capital).
The
key principle of this international re-engagement is the sanctification of
private capital/property. Regardless of its nefarious
colonial history of dispossession and eventual profiteering motivated globalization.
In perpetuity. (Crosscheck Thomas Piketty’s most recent book “Capital and Ideology”)
Reading between the lines, though it is not directly mentioned,
there is an intention to then arrive at priority number three at ‘performance legitimacy’. This being the assumed ‘trickle down effect’ of
neoliberal economics.
As highlighted earlier, this begins with the pursuit of a
massive infrastructural development or rehabilitation programme. This includes
some of those currently underway with regards to roads (some which urbanites
like me do not know of), airports, Parliament, power stations and hospitals. What the public eye can literally see is what
it will appreciate. Hence social media
has been slightly agog at the Harare-Masvingo-Beitbridge road rehabilitation project
or even the new Parliament building in Mazowe.
This infrastructural development has the end effect of demonstrating a ‘man at work’ persona for Mnangagwa and he knows this.
Through this he however is ensuring the creation of a local private capital investment, for lack of a better word, ‘mafia’ that not only sees business opportunity but also understands that once in, they are all in this together with the current government. It then becomes an elite state-local business/private capital pact about how if ‘you look after me, I will look after you’. And this is the trend in global superpower countries wherein the revolving door between state and private capital is not only regular but is an establishment or oligarchy on its own.
Including new pacts with former
white commercial farmers that are now scheduled to be compensated for the ‘infrastructural
developments’ they undertook on land that in the majority of cases was acquired
during the period of Rhodesian settler colonialism.
And a fourth priority becomes one in which there is
the elevation of public-private partnerships for social service delivery. The key issue being that these services such
as health, transport, water, energy, education, media and broader social
welfare can be achieved in tandem with the profit motivated interests of
private capital. As it accedes to and recognizes
the fact that its latter-said profits will come from state capital.
But lets go back a little bit to conversations on the national
political economy of Zimbabwe under Mnangagwa’s government. Many neoliberal economists, civil society
activists and political actors are finding it difficult to fault the NDS1
except on the basis of implementation and allegations of corruption at various
levels. In other words, they in all likelihood silently/secretly agree with it.
I personally disagree with it in relation to its ideological premise of setting
up a free market framework for a ‘socialism for private capital’.
The reasons why some would want it to succeed is not so much
politically partisan on either side of our political divide. It is regrettably mainly about recognition
and a return to what Mnangagwa himself has referred to as ‘normalcy’ in
international economics/private capital. With the primary question and
competition being about who in post-Mugabe Zimbabwe, achieves this under the judgmental
gaze of private capital.
*Takura Zhangazha writes here in his personal capacity
(takura-zhangazha.blogspot.com)
No comments:
Post a Comment