Bikita and Zimbabwe's Curse of Elitist Diamond Extraction
By Takura Zhangazha.
The Masvingo Mirror
newspaper of 3-4 February 2012 recently carried a story, ‘Diamonds Discovered in Bikita’ on
its front page and its website. For those
in government, this was news that they probably already knew even though the
story says that some relevant officials refused to comment on the matter. In
any event those in political leadership either at local and national government
levels had probably already celebrated given the prospect of more revenue for
them to distribute initially among themselves and perhaps allow small trickles
of the same to reach the people of Bikita and of Zimbabwe.
On the contrary for the everyday Bikita resident,this
may not be immediate cause for celebration if any at all. This is because they saw and experienced the
tragic and socially calamitous events that visited Chiadzwa in Marange. The concerns that arise for the common man
then become whether they will be
forcibly relocated, whether there will be the introduction of the military
and police into the community and the attendant culture of fear and violence
that was witnessed in Chiadzwa.
The long and short of it is that the residents of Bikita are
now faced with an even more uncertain and potentially unsecure future. And I
make this assertion based on a number of factors that are now no longer just a
challenge in Bikita, but across the entirety of Zimbabwe.
These factors are those that initially relate to the fact
that our government, before and after Chiadzwa has been extremely secretive
about our country’s national mineral wealth. In the aftermath of Chiadzwa,
there has never been a comprehensive follow up plan to the issues of a national
mineral wealth assessment plan that are in the public domain.
While the state has recently established a mineral’s assessment
authority, its role has not been made adequately public and it is yet to issue
information relevant to a planned strategic utilization of whatever mineral
deposits we have in the national interest.
In the wake of the Bikita discovery (and whatever other minerals that
are being kept secret from us), it is reported that there is a company called Bayrich
that is the licensed operator. Whether the Bikita public were aware of such a
company and its primary intentions vis-à-vis compensation for the damage to the environment, change in livelihoods and
culture as a result of the influx of miners and related businesses, is a
question that the Ministry of Mines, the local member of parliament and councilors
must answer. It is however apparent that
if anyone knew of the awarding of this license to Bayrich, they can only be
people with political and financial influence.
A further factor to consider is that the government is
betraying a characteristic that is potentially undemocratic in relation to how there
seems to be silent collusion between prospective miners and the licensing
authorities. Given the fact that there
are laws the determine how a license is awarded, the fact that there is limited
obligation on the part of the state to interact with an affected community such
as that of Bikita, makes everything appear murkier and leaves an unpleasant
aroma of elitist collusion at the expense of the public good.
Obviously the government will be the first to claim that
everything was above ‘board’ and that anyone who is complaining about the
manner in which Bikita was prospected and a mining licence awarded is bitter.
Such posturing will be indicative of a government that is being dishonest with
the people . No one is disputing the national significance of the discovery of
a precious mineral in profitable quantities. What is however in dispute is the
secretive methodology of prospecting and awarding of mineral licenses without
the participation of members of a directly affected community and without
public hearings to the same. It is
patently undemocratic to explain the awarding of a mining licence after the
event and as the mining company is already moving equipment into the heart of a
resettlement village as is now the case in Bikita.
The mantra of promoting development and foreign direct
investment in Zimbabwe via this route does not hold water, no matter how the
inclusive government would want us to believe that they are functioning in our
best interests. In fact the inclusive
government is to all intents and purposes now functioning in the interests of
its members, those closely associated to them and international or local
companies whose primary interest is extraction and departure. Even if these mining
companies sponsor a local football tournament or coverage of international
football tournaments, it remains a flawed private-public partnership by any
stretch of the imagination.
As it is, Bikita is now in the birth pangs of a development
that will change its landscape significantly for the foreseeable future.
Whereas in democratic societies this would be cause for celebration, in this
instance it is news that makes one wonder how such a decision was arrived at
and who stands to benefit. Sure, there will
be explanations from government, but these will only be to paper over the
cracks, extract the mineral and limit further public scrutiny without adequate compensation
to the affected community. And once again, in another part of the country,
another community will be a sitting target.
No comments:
Post a Comment