By Takura Zhangazha*
Cde Lovemore Matombo, the former president of the Zimbabwe
Congress of Trade Unions (ZCTU) quietly passed on this week. An organic intellectual and left leaning trade
unionist for many years, he had an unassuming aura about his person that never
betrayed the immense role he had played in keeping trade unionism afloat after
the formation of the then worker’s party Movement for Democratic Change (MDC).
And also as a successor ZCTU president to the inimitable and
regrettably also late, Gibson Sibanda.
Together with then secretary general, Wellington Chibebe, Matombo,
ensured that the ZCTU would have a smooth leadership transition after the
resignation of its then charismatic secretary general, again also late, Morgan Tsvangirai.
Matombo was to ably steer the ZCTU through the difficult
years of being accused of being an affiliate of the opposition MDC, the hyperinflation
years of 2008-2010, the informalisation of the economy and the general crackdown
on human rights by the Mugabe government. This also included phases in which he,
together with his colleagues in the trade union movement would be arrested and tortured
for irgansiing either national stay-aways’ or demonstrations against either
unfair labour practices, the high cost of living or the dire state of human
rights in the country.
Matombo also sought to maintain the ZCTU’s critical historical
role in challenging the hegemony of the ruling Zanu Pf party. I specifically mention ‘hegemony’ because
ideologically Matombo was as clea as daylight on his social democratic credentials. He did not challenge Zanu PF merely because
it was in power and ruling badly. He challenged
Zanu Pf primarily on the basis of how he directly disagreed with it’s ideological
outlook. One which was largely a radical
neoliberal nationalism that relied more on the past than it sought solutions
for the future.
In conversation with him he would also aver that in part the
opposition MDC, as initially formed by the congress of trade unions, was also
beginning to lose its ideological social democratic radar to neoliberalism. In mentioning this he would however point out
the difficulties he was facing in the labour movement trying to navigate
various blind loyalties to either political parties or embassies by some of his
colleagues and affiliate unions. And how in part he could not however risk any
further division of the union in the difficult operating environment that was
already increasingly hostile to unionism.
A unique characteristic that Matombo demonstrated was his evident
willingness to interact with civil society.
The ZCTU was still by far the largest organization outside of the state
and churches, but he never had a high browed approach to meet with CSOs’. I always fondly remember his hearty welcomes at the annual May Day/Workers Day rallies.
He also never hesitated to participate in broader multi-stakeholder
engagements such as that which would bring about the Zimbabwe People’s
Charter. Or to directly engage with the
National Constitutional Assembly (NCA) and challenge the Zanu-PF- MDC constitutional
reform process of 2010-2013 on the basis of democratic principle.
The
latter was also to make him lose some allies in civil society, affiliate unions
and the international community. But he
stuck to his principles. I do not recall
him expressing regret on the decisions he made about his ideological persuasions
or strategic considerations on either constitutionalism or the national political
economy.
This was demonstrable via one particular example concerning
the Zimbabwe National Students Union (ZINASU).
Matombo was a keen supporter of student and youth activism. He however had a keen intent that it not be directly
similar to the way it was done in Zanu Pf, that is be based on materialism and
raw populism. At a time when the MDC-T
was fighting for control of ZINASU, Matombo chose to support an organic student
leadership that was not influenced ether by populism, donors or mercenary
politicians. Together with the NCA, the
ZCTU supported a progressive ZINASU and refused to succumb to undue pressure on
the matter.
On matters beyond unionism Matombo would always demonstrate organic
and progressive knowledge. And always in its left leaning assessment of global
events and how a better world is possible.
And he also had an amazing sense of caustic humour. At one time we had travelled to Chinhoyi for
a Zinasu national congress in 2010 as solidarity delegates. We were slightly late but had not had
breakfast and so we headed to the dining hall.
Once there I noticed how quickly he was handling his breakfast. He noticed my startled expression and looked
up at me and said, “Cde Zhangazha, eat quickly.
We might get arrested. And we don’t want that on empty stomachs!”
Or the way he would specially mention the Zimbabwe Broadcasting
Corporation (ZBC) for its propaganda against the ZCTU by mockingly referring to
it as ‘Zete Biii Ciii!’
Cde Matombo is a man that will be sorely missed by Zimbabwe’s
left and its progressive civil society.
Even more significantly his brand of labour unionism that can only be
admired and urgently learnt from.
Takura Zhangazha writes here in his personal capacity
(takura-zhangazha.blogspot.com)
Zete Bee Ceee tinyareiwo please! Go well Leader Matombo.
ReplyDeleteGood piece. Progressive move to immortalize an almost forgotten hero. A hero whose plight points to a worryingly deepening ahistoricism.
ReplyDeleteA fair tribute there Cde Zheng.
ReplyDelete