By Takura Zhangazha*
Zimbabwe’s government recently announced a change to street
names and state owned buildings in all of its majors cities and towns.
The roads that were renamed mostly had former Rhodesian settler
state’s heroes names. In their place government
named some of the busiest or iconic city and town roads after persons such as
the current president, Emerson Mnangagwa and a host of other national heroes of
the liberation struggle. Or those of the
precolonial period.
And urban as well as Diaspora social media went apoplectic.
Quite literally. If any Zimbabwean wanted
to quote Shakespeare in his epic romantic play Romeo and Juliet, we would have
ask the famous question, ‘What’s in a name?’
The answer would not be, and I am paraphrasing here, by any
other one a rose would still smell as sweet. Mainly because urban and Diaspora
based Zimbabweans are in perpetual search of catharsis. Especially on social media. So names do matter to them. Except in the opposite historical
direction. For many of us, recognition
of the liberation struggle nationalism of old is of limited economic and political
consequence.
They want the immediate.
Hence on social media the stories are palpably clear in their angst at
the prioritization by central government of street name changes. A great many are arguing, why change the
names of roads that are in a bad state.
Fix them first is the argument.
Or alternatively, a derision at the retention of liberation history as
the sine qua non of the basis on which
streets or national symbols should be renamed.
These widely shared opinions are as astounding as they are laden
with political meaning. In this, the palpably high emotion is reflective of a dead national consciousness. I would have preferred to say a dying
national consciousness ala carte Fanon but in our Zimbabwean case, we are
already lost at sea.
We have essentially ‘othered’ ourselves to the extent of
being exceedingly dismissive of our own history. Almost as though we do not want to remember
it.
Or if we do, we would probably want
our own convoluted and biased versions of it.
Depending on which political party one sympathizes with. And its all fair game. Except that it is one
with diminishing national return and a decimation of a collective whole. Which is something that those in the ruling
Zanu Pf party should be extremely worried about.
The populist urban desire to ‘un-recognise’ liberation
struggle history in favor of a materialist present does not bode well for
Zimbabwe’s future. Instead it makes for
a soulless national and country when its supposedly best and brightest will give
the global mainstream media and social media companies so much behavioural data
against their own being.
We could choose to blame the ‘patriotic history’ narrative
engineered by Mugabe with his ‘ndisu chete’ (it is us only) narrow perception
of the liberation struggle. A narrative
that stubbornly sticks to how ordinary Zimbabweans are made to recall their own
liberation struggle history.
That our real and lived struggles against colonialism are
now dismissible in today’s raw and ephemeral populism is something that quite
literally breaks my heart. Even at the
risk of sounding ridiculous. We are at a
place in which even our ancestors are asking themselves many questions as to
how things have turned out like this.
Not only I relation to the material/economic suffering of our people but
more significantly the chasms in what was always a progressive national
consciousness.
But someone has switched of the brain plug in Zimbabwe. The erosion of a critical national consciousness
began with the narrow historical narratives of Znau Pf. And are now firmly in the hands of the would
be and wannabe purveyors of neoliberalism accompanied by hedonistic
religiosity.
Simply put, we are no longer ourselves. We want to be viewed by others in order to be
validated. To the same extent that this
then becomes a process of othering ourselves.
But because of our ahistorical embrace of populism and
warped mix of religiosity and hedonism, we will continue to forget ourselves.
Deliberately so. What we may require is a return to pragmatic Pan Africanism.
One that views the world and its developments from a critically conscious Pan
African lens. And with a focus not just on the past but more significantly, on the future and the collective posterity
it should embody.
So yes I long ago put it into my middle aged head that
Second Street Extension is now Sam Nujoma Street. Or that Foruth Street is now
Simon Muzenda Street. And I will do the
same with the new fact that colonial Charter Road with all its historical
implications is now called Fidel Castro road.
Or that formerly Speke Avenue is now Agostino Neto Avenue. And that the
road to Dzivaresekwa formerly known as Kirkman Drive is now Solomon Mujuru
Drive. All because it helps me remain
historically grounded. Warts and all. Even though I do not have to wear a poppy
on Remembrance Day.
*Takura Zhangazha writes here in his personal capacity
(takura-zhangazha.blogspot.com)
No comments:
Post a Comment