By Takura Zhangazha*
Reading Nelson Mandela's autobiography in late 1997, I remember being
struck by one particular paragraph that somewhat shocked me out of my
messianic deification of the African icon. In it, he writes as if to make sure that the
readers of his life story would understand that his decision to join the
liberation struggle of South Africa was one based on pragmatism and necessity. The
specific paragraph reads, 'I had no epiphany, no singular revelation, no
moment of truth, but a steady accumulation of a thousand slights, a
thousand indignities, and a thousand unremembered moments provoked
in me an anger, a rebelliousness, a desire to fight the system that
imprisoned my people.' He also makes sure to insist, 'there was no
particular day on which I said, 'Henceforth I will pursue the liberation
of my people,instead, I simply found myself doing so, and could not do
otherwise'.
It was a bit of a dampener because my then eager mind had been
expecting a messianic narrative, even a 'Saul on the road to Damascus'
moment for Mandela to make that 'final' decision to 'join' the struggle.
Well it turns out he did not have that singular moment, a development that seems to be
true for most African liberation movement leaders. Their leadership and
participation in liberation struggles seems to have been driven by the
sum total of their complete and repressive encounter with the inhumane
apparatus that was the settler/colonial state at both personal and
societal levels. Add to this the fact that the repression also had a
Manichean character to it, then it is easier to fathom how and why not
only the leaders but also thousands of Africans chose to join various
liberation struggles across the continent. It was the 'age of
resistance' by necessity and by the dictate of the common desire for
equality and human dignity.
It is however the aftermath of these same said struggles and the
decisions made by our liberators that is now problematic. Contemporary
leaders of not only Zimbabwe but also in most parts of Africa no longer
understand the primary challenges of leadership and why they choose or
are chosen to lead. This is because most of our leaders, even if they
admire the courage needed to have undertaken the liberation struggle,
have tended to be lost on why they are now in leadership proper. They do
not see the thousand slights that the Mandela's and others experienced
because they think that sort of leadership was only suited to era of
anti-colonial movements and therefore assume the same leadership rules
don't apply. This is probably a direct result of the fact that they
believe the era of 'revolutionary Africa' is definitively over and as a
direct result thereof, tend to apply themselves less in leadership roles
and styles.
They no longer take time out to understand the societies and
countries they lead, opting instead for prescriptions from
international experts or transnational corporations who will promise
temporary investments both into a specific corner of the countries they
lead as well as an investment in their personal welfare. In other
words, African leadership is now increasingly for sale. There are fewer
and fewer leaders that find themselves pursuing the liberation of their
people for lack of an option and as a fundamental necessity. Not that we
expect them to be Mandelas or Cabrals but it would help if they
demonstrated the requisite consciousness of the historic task of
democratically pursuing the continuing socio-economic liberation of
African peoples. And this beyond their politics of the belly.
At the risk of being accused of being nostalgic or even naive about
former leaders, the key issue is that leaders like Mandela make it clear
that they knew what they were doing in their time, and seriously so.
Their vision was apparent but not easy even though analyzing their
challenges was much more straightforward; they had to dismantle the
apartheid/settler state and establish sovereign and democratic ones. After
that, they had to pass on the leadership baton not necessarily to leaders
that would mimic them, but those that would understand the revolutionary
and founding vision of the people's struggles for emancipation. And it
is in this regard that our contemporary leaders have failed dismally
(inclusive of those that participated in liberation struggles and still
hold on to power). A number have gotten into or close to power on
phenomenally popular waves, only to betray majorities in favour of
mimicry of the West or East and in the process undermining historical
opportunities for progressive and people centered democratic change.
As
it is, we might need to have a contemporary African leadership that has
a singular epiphany, one that remembers who we are and where we intend
to go without falling prey to the easy and nefarious path of the
politics of aggrandizement or unashamed neo-colonialism ( be it from the
East or West). And like Mandela, in his heyday, this singular epiphany will be on
the basis that, while there is no particular day in which they will say
'Henceforth I will pursue the liberation of my people,' they will
simply find themselves doing so because they cannot do otherwise.
*Takura Zhangazha writes here in his personal capacity (takura-zhangazha.blogspot.com)
Spot on Cde!
ReplyDeleteI agree with you Takura, many of these leaders are rent seeking. They seek political office purely for the benefits they get with being insuch positions. They make it too dirty for the smart to enter and too barbaric for the intellectuals to be part. The political office of today is not an office of honor. We need to find ourselves liberating the rest like Mandela without waiting on a day when the urinate into your mouth.
ReplyDeleteI should assert barely that its astounding! The blog is informational also always fabricate amazing entitys. Management and Leadership Training Courses in London
ReplyDelete